how come they don't with "white supremicists"?
I mean if I try hard I can understand their reasoning. Not all muslims are radical jihadist. Not all who follow the teaching of the islamic faith want to kill the infidels. So if the left are concerned that sticking the label of Radical Muslim Terrorist or any combination would taint the nonradical peace loving one, I can live with that. It might make sense. But if we take it at that, at face value, then why is it that they don't have an issue with "white supremacy" or "white supremicists"? I'm white but I don't kill minorities or even hate them. Nor do I get my panties in wad when the term white supremicist is used. But isn't it just a tad hypocritical so refuse to label a group of people who murder in the name of their religion by their religion because you don't want to broad brush then yet have no problem do the exact same thing with a race of people?
Just food for thought..... and to see how the few liberals will justify it.
PS-please don't try to suggest he hasn't used that teminology. A simple google search will debunk that. I'll assume you know how to "google" something.
Bookmarks