Trump was dismissed for claiming he may have won the popular vote if not for possible illegal aliens and other non-eligible people voting in the election. Chicago prefers dead people most of the time.
That statement was widely chided, derided and dismissed. It would take MILLIONS of invalid votes for it to swing. the actual margin ended up being about 2.8 million, so you'd need about that many illegal votes for Hillary to flip it. No doubt a very high number, above most estimates of voter fraud.
But now Texas has data showing they had 95,000 non citizens on the rolls, with 58,000 having voted in at least 1 election. Texas has about 16 million registered voters, so that's 0.59375% of their voters on the rolls who were illegal, and 0.3625% of the actual votes against registered voters.
Well, if we take the 0.3625% against the roughly 129 million votes cast in the 2016 Presidential election, that's about 466,000 votes. If the nation is like Texas that means Hillary still wins of course, but it's a LOT more fraudulent votes than most would ever think existed.
Except, Texas already has one of the tougher voter registration laws in the nation. What about California, which has numerous counties far more generous in their reviews? What about states with same day registration?
It may be hard to get to 2.8 million, but it wouldn't be too hard to get to 1 million would it? It doesn't put 2.8 million utterly out of the realm of possibility, but it could easily be enough to make a difference in some areas or counties or Congressional districts couldn't it?
Anyway, an interesting number. I imagine if we included outright fraud, like these mail-in absentee ballots things California is using that let a single activist go around and "collect" ballots from thousands of people, with little if any verification, maybe 2.8 million isn't far off in total of all fraud. May not get that high, but I bet it gets high enough to shift some races here and there for sure.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tex...000-have-voted
Bookmarks