Yet another Trump facepalm moment

[Doc]

Trump rightly getting raked over the coals over his post Helsinki presser. He wants to see Hilary's server? Really? Putin denies meddling..and you believe him? Really? That is the best he could come up with? Maybe he REALLY IS AS DUMB as the democrat try to portray you.

[CitizenBBN]

I knew this would go really badly from the start. Optics were going to be bad no matter what he said or did, and I was sure he'd say and do enough wrong things to make people go nuts. he's doing it on purpose, he wants to goad them, it's how he does everything.

But in this case he's goading a lot of people he won't intend to goad. Guess I'm not bent b/c I planned on it, will be curious to see where it goes from here more than what happened, b/c I expected him to be as politically tone deaf as possible for this thing.

He's not "dumb", but he is as stubborn as most people who get that high up, and he is defiant to the point of saying and doing very dumb things just to remain defiant. He'll cut off his nose to spite his face, which he has now done.

But I knew this guy as President would be two steps forward and one back in the best possible scenario. I would have picked any one of a bunch of others, but they either didn't run or didn't win.

The good news is Trump's impact when it's negative is in the PR area, substantively overall it's been a very positive Presidency. It's in his behavior that he's a running hot mess.

[KeithKSR]

I find it amazing that the CIA and FBI pronounce guilt without having access to the servers. They are taking the DNC’s word for it that it traces to the Russians. If it was the Russians they would have left a trail pointing toward another culprit.

[Doc]

I find it amazing that the CIA and FBI pronounce guilt without having access to the servers. They are taking the DNC’s word for it that it traces to the Russians. If it was the Russians they would have left a trail pointing toward another culprit.

sure, but still.... his comments bordered on buffoonery. The cast of characters in this whole thing is something so stupid even a bad script in hollywood would could not come up with it in a spoof film. You go Session played by Dom DeLuse who is the man in change but does NOTHING. You got an imbecile in Comey played by Robert De Nero, Alec Baldwin as Strzok and Joy Bahar as his lover.

Oh, and Red Buttons as Donald Trump

[UKHistory]

Not buffonery. I wish it was. It is something much worse

I have said too much.

[CitizenBBN]

Not buffonery. I wish it was. It is something much worse

I have said too much.

It's not. The world isn't nearly as sophisticated as to pull off such things. Trump has attacked and killed Russian troops, something Obama never did.

Trump has a pattern. Trump praises people who praise him, and rips anyone who rips him, and he turns on a dime. Kim Jong Un went from "Little Rocket Man" to a great guy b/c that suited Trump that day.

He doesn't put much weight or meaning on particular words or things he says. he goes for impact, for shock. Has for decades, and still does. And he'll double down for no damned reason at all.

Good example: that Mexico will pay for the wall. he had no need to say it politically, his supporters have no problem paying for the wall. They'd give to a GoFundMe to build it. Didn't win him votes, he just blustered. Then when it was obvious that was not to be taken literally, he doubles down on it and keeps pushing it.

FWIW Coach Cal has done that a few times too. Very successful men don't like being questioned by those they see as their "camp", they tend to double down on things that get resistance instead of backing off.

It's just his psychology, not some deep dark plan. Obama wasn't sent here by the mullahs on some secret mission, and Trump isn't a deep cover agent for the Russians.

Obama is just a socialist, and Trump is a reality TV star New Yorker who got where he got by putting his foot in his mouth repeatedly and claiming it was a turkey sandwich.

And he'll do it a bunch more while he's President, and I imagine he'll be President for 2 terms in spite of it.

My only gripe is he thinks his success is because of it, when in reality in politics it's in spite of it. He doesn't see it, and won't. Wish he would, but he's the wrench to break things, can't be too bent when he breaks stuff I like too b/c I knew he would be a blunt tool. But it's all so messed up we'll have to take the collateral damage and hope he breaks a whole bunch everywhere.

[CitizenBBN]

Oh, and Putin knows how Trump works, which is why he has never attacked Trump. Even when we bombed Syria Putin never blustered back at him personally. He is playing Trump on that front.

The question is if Trump is playing Putin by going along. We'll only know as we see how policy develops, b/c so far on a policy level we've created more hegemony against Russia in one year under Trump than we did in 8 under Obama.

Is Trump playing a deeper game here? I'm dubious, but the proof will be in what we do policy wise in places like Ukraine.

[CitizenBBN]

Do I think this was going to be bad PR for Trump regardless? Yes. Unavoidable no matter what he did.

Do I think he made it worse through his choices? Oh yes, definitely.

But today one "analyst" likened the event to Kristallnacht and even 9/11. Are you freaking kidding me??????

FWIW, that's the "night of broken glass", the beginning of the end of the Jewish people in Germany, when the SA Brownshirts went storming through Germany and in one night killed between dozens and hundreds of Jews, destroyed dozens of synagogues, destroyed thousands of Jewish businesses, etc. It was in many ways the beginning of the arrests and camps.

Really? A photo op meeting was like the kickoff party for the Holocaust or a terror attack that killed thousands and shook the world and set off what is going on a 20 year military occupation? Are you out of your mind? How do you function and do things like basic math and believe that nonsense?

Trump very predictably mishandled the event, but in the end it was a damned press conference which will matter for a few days in the news cycle and then be replaced by the next outrage. It was hardly the equivalent of any REAL tragedy.

I get not liking Trump. I get thinking he's an idiot even. BUt I don't get this level of nonsensical response to his actions or more importantly his ranting words.

[Doc]

The constant referals to Nazi Germany is an insult to the Holocaust and those who suffered that atrocity. Tha acts of a single boorish man and the acts of a man who was responsible for the vile starvation and death of over 7 million innocent people icluding women and children is disgusting

[KeithKSR]

The constant referals to Nazi Germany is an insult to the Holocaust and those who suffered that atrocity. Tha acts of a single boorish man and the acts of a man who was responsible for the vile starvation and death of over 7 million innocent people icluding women and children is disgusting

The left doesn’t realize the use of super hyperbole cannot be effective when it is continuously used, and people continually see their gloom and doom scenarios do not come to pass.

[badrose]

The left doesn’t realize the use of super hyperbole cannot be effective when it is continuously used, and people continually see their gloom and doom scenarios do not come to pass.

That's a lot more concise than what I was about to say. I think those who do it do it for themselves.

[Doc]

The left doesn’t realize the use of super hyperbole cannot be effective when it is continuously used, and people continually see their gloom and doom scenarios do not come to pass.

Exactly...its like "racism". To me it no longer means anything because it is so over-used. Under the last administration, if you disagreed on POLICY, you were a racist. You didn't think the government should be involved in health care decisions, it was because you were racist??? If you felt the government should not be purchasing car and then destroying them, well, you felt that way because you were racist. If you wanted lower taxes, its because you felt minorities were inferior and were a racist. If you opposed a weapons ban, its because its was what the black president wanted and thus you were racist, if you supported law and order you were racist because the police are all racists, etc... The word literally lost all meaning.

[UKHistory]

Both sides of the political spectrum have dehumanized the other.

Rush's show and many comments here have mocked liberals and say they are unpatriotic and UnAmerican too.

When you pull the Hitler card, you better use it judiciously. It does lose meaning and a person can lose credibility if used inappropriately.

Sadam Hussein--not Hitler. Osama Bin Laden--not Hitler. Rick Pitino--well...nevermind

Bad guys they are. But facism creeps in slowly--like mold. If you notice the beginnings (and the left and right are equally susceptible to falling to facism) you should speak up.

At some point, remember the little boy cried wolf and the wolf eventually came.

There is a Bear.

[Catonahottinroof]

I’d also suggest using racist, fascist and Hitler as referrals on this particular administration also loses their force and reference point . Political pundits and the press are reaching the extremes on both sides.

Both sides of the political spectrum have dehumanized the other.

Rush's show and many comments here have mocked liberals and say they are unpatriotic and UnAmerican too.

When you pull the Hitler card, you better use it judiciously. It does lose meaning and a person can lose credibility if used inappropriately.

Sadam Hussein--not Hitler. Osama Bin Laden--not Hitler. Rick Pitino--well...nevermind

Bad guys they are. But facism creeps in slowly--like mold. If you notice the beginnings (and the left and right are equally susceptible to falling to facism) you should speak up.

At some point, remember the little boy cried wolf and the wolf eventually came.

There is a Bear.

[Darryl]

Apparently, 95% of the media and the Left are not going to be happy until we have a shooting war with Russia. That should turn out well. Trump clearly cannot differentiate between the collusion claims against him and the Russian "meddling" in the 2016 election. He needs to say he never colluded AND Russia clearly is guilty of election tampering.

FYI, the USA has meddled in many other countries' domestic affairs. It is a big boy world; grow up.

By the Left's definition, FDR certainly was a traitor at the end of WWII allowing Stalin to draw whatever boundaries he wished in Europe.

From my viewpoint, anything that helped Hillary lose is a very good thing. I sleep very well at night but I truly shudder to think had she won, we would have Obama and Elizabeth Warren on the Supreme Court.

Darryl

[CitizenBBN]

Trump clearly cannot differentiate between the collusion claims against him and the Russian "meddling" in the 2016 election. He needs to say he never colluded AND Russia clearly is guilty of election tampering.
Darryl

I think that's a lot of the problem.

Policy wise he's been harder on Russia than Obama, but none of that gets mentioned. In language I agree it doesn't match, but I think a lot of it is Trump's lack of subtlety and ability to differentiate. His bombast and sweeping generalities works well for him sometimes, but is working against him in this case, and I knew it would from the time they announced the summit.

He sees the "russian thing" as one big attack on him. Part of it is an attack on him, part of it isn't. His wise political move was to accept the meddling stuff and hit Russia hard, go ape-**** about Russia, be more upset about their meddling than his enemies are, and that nullifies much of their ability to use the issue against him.

[Doc]

Its interesting the the Russian meddling scandal is blamed on Trump when it happened in 2016, when Obama was President. Trump had no ability to stop it. Obama ignored it despite knowing about it and his response was to tell Putin to "cut it out". Meanwhile, Russia was feeding the DNC dirt on Trump, and the federal govt was using that against Trump and the issue people have is that the Russian influence cost HRC the election. Amazing