Not sure what you're getting at there History, but your post does in fact prove my point very well.
Note that the site points out that it is now the THIRD largest budget behind defense and health care. Also note the timeline, that it was promoted to a full cabinet department in 1980, and that it now spends $150 billion in loans and per Wiki their regular budget is $70 billion. I don't know how the loans count in, but if they're just behind defense and medicine they have a big big budget.
Now let's look at how all that money (not counting obviously the huge increases in state and local budgets) spent since 1980 has helped:
As we can see, since the rough establishment of federalized education spending has skyrocketed as the actual results have changed little.
Now let's look just at federal spending as a percentage change over time versus improvement in scores:
As the graph shows, Reagan was no fan of the DoE so spending went up little, but after him it went up very fast and under Obama has skyrocketed even more.
Yet again, the results of all that spending has been basically zilch in terms of actual improvement in ability to read, write, or do math. The fundamentals are not the target of all that money. What has gone up is the number of bureaucrats and the amount spent on facilities and non-core educational initiatives.
The obvious conclusion is that the focus on spending huge sums at the federal level for education, education testing and everything else has netted no real gains in the actual quality of that education.
There may be other factors, for example dropout rates have been declining during this period, but that rate has been pretty linear over a long period and doesn't tie well to all the spending. It may help, but not much.
And in the end the unavoidable fact is this: MANY industrial countries spend less on education than the US and have better results in core competency such as math, science, reading. When we're spending that much more and getting less, it's time to examine the very core assumptions of what we are doing.
As a nation built on free markets, vaulting us from afterthought backwater to the most powerful economy the world has known, why would we reject any use of free market principles in our education system on the principle that they are in some way just inherently evil? It's nonsense.
Bookmarks