Cool as a rule, but sometimes bad is bad.
Honestly, this could have been an internal test page for the web developers. I am not ready to break out the pitch forks yet. This is around the time when the WebDev's would be working on the pages. During testing, the content of the page would not be important. They would be mainly testomg the backend stuff, ie. auto-updating from new report files as the the percent reported increases. On a page like this the data would NOT be static, it would be stupid to have someone updating all of the fields. Instead, you would use a single file that is auto-updated. The website pulls its numbers from that file. It is possible it is a design test, where they are trying to see how it looks (as well as testing it on different browsers). So knowing what I know about the software dev cycle, that a page like this exists doesn't surprise me at all.
This was my thought as well. Setting the formats, testing how the data makes it to the site, etc.......Originally Posted by PedroDaGr8
Aging is an extraordinary process where you become the person you always should have been.--David Bowie.
Does it matter that George Soros is supplying many of the machines?
Cool as a rule, but sometimes bad is bad.
That is irrelevant to the web page on the news site. I don't think the webpage is evidence of fraud or vote rigging. The most logical answer for the page you linked to is that its a developers test page. I'm not saying there will or won't be fraud, just this web page is NOT evidence of it.
Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
I don't know that this shows the fix is in, but the casual dismissal of the idea that the vote tallys can be tampered with is just a mass naivety combined with simple need to be in denial.
I'm not saying it is happening in large numbers, but the media always says that "most experts see it as exceedingly rare" or some similar statement, and that's dangerous IMO.
I can tell you, it's easier than you think. I'm betting that the Vegas casinos are far more secure in how they handle their slot machines than in how voting machines are secured and tested. Then there are the tabulation machines they go to, and anywhere in that code you can bury something.
We have multiple people out of Texas saying they hit the button for a straight GOP ticket and in the review Clinton got checked. Now maybe that was human error, but why assume it was? In my voting machine "straight ticket" is awfully easy, and you'd have to actively click by Hillary's name to get it to change that vote. The state officials blew it off, but I think these things need to be taken seriously. Pull the machine, give it to the FBI's cyber people and just be SURE.
With all this online and absentee and early voting it will only get easier to commit fraud. Not to mention the insane notion in many states that you don't even need to show ID to vote. That's just stupid, I don't care who it offends. As backward as Kentucky is we've had to show ID for decades and decades.
To that end, here's a great example, someone signed up 83 people to the same address, all with different names, surely to then go by and pick up the ballots, fill them out and send in 83 fake votes:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...side-home.html
Now that's 80 votes, but do that time and again and I have little doubt that at a bare minimum it adds up to hundreds of thousands of fake votes if not 1-2 million. Maybe not enough in a blowout race, but enough in key districts to swing a national big race, but IMO far more able to impact local and state wide races.
So it happens. the only question is if it is widespread enough to make a difference in the outcomes of elections or not, but there is ZERO doubt it is happening. A major source are groups like ACORN and the like, who go around on "get out the vote" drives where what they are doing is signing folks up and making sure they fill out their ballots the "right" way, and then signing them up even if they don't sign up, then signing up some other people who don't even exist.
Every state should require a government issued ID to vote, and every voter should have to be registered in advance and be validated through either the taxpayer or driver's license roles. Period, end of debate. If you didn't file a tax return and don't drive, I'm not worried about your voting so much as why you haven't been charged with tax evasion (even if you don't owe it's the law you have to file).
People keep asking if I'm back and I haven't really had an answer. But now, yeah, I'm thinkin' I'm back.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks