This is on the heels of a number of prominent imams in the UK issuing a fatwa against ISIS, serving ISIS or assisting ISIS in any way. Which if you read that article explains that any sort of support of the so called ISIS is haram, which is better translated as a severe and great sin and as such much not only be not done but must be actively fought against.
On to the document that I mention in the title: Here This document is a very interesting read, it takes some time but is well worth it. It basically lays out how the so called ISIS is using a corrupted version of Islam and refutes their ideology point by point. It explains that their entire basis for existence is fundamentally wrong and un-islamic, let alone their policies and behaviors. It uses theological arguments to refute everything in a logical manner.
They also ask that people not call them the Islamic Caliphate or the Islamic State because they are neither instead referring to them as the so-called or self-styled ISIS. They address this in the letter:
In your speech you quoted the Companion Abu Bakr Al-Siddiq : ‘I have been given authority over you, and I am not the best of you.’ This begs the question: who gave you authority over the ummah? Was it your group? If this is the case, then a group of no more than several thousand has appointed itself the ruler of over a billion and a half Muslims. This attitude is based upon a corrupt circular logic that says: ‘Only we are Muslims, and we decide who the caliph is, we have chosen one and so whoever does not accept our caliph is not a Muslim.’ In this case, a caliph is nothing more than the leader of a certain group that declares more than 99% of Muslims non-Muslim. On the other hand, if you recognize the billion and a half people who consider themselves Muslims, how can you not consult (shura) them regarding your so-called caliphate? Thus, you face one of two conclusions: either you concur that they are Muslims and they did not appoint you caliph over them—in which case you are not the caliph—or, the other conclusion is that you do not accept them as Muslims, in which case Muslims are a small group not in need of a caliph, so why use the word ‘caliph’ at all?
Bookmarks