Smart strategy, but far from Presidential
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bid...-chris-wallace
Biden has been actively ducking interviews and media encounters for a while. Clearly the entire strategy is to let Trump be his own worst enemy, which is smart, but should a man be President when he is unwilling to face the media or voters in any capacity and just hides and waits to win as a protest vote?
What a sad state of affairs we've come to in America, all around.
Re: Smart strategy, but far from Presidential
Very disappointing, the country is in total chaos with liberals/Democrats wanting to blame Trump which is just an excuse for more Democratic control.
Re: Smart strategy, but far from Presidential
I look forward to see what the DEM and the REP platforms are for this coming election. Neither one will in all likelihood be an honest projection of their goals in the coming 4 years. Having said that the current President has tried to honor his previous promises. They may not have been to our liking but the administration has acted on their promises.
Re: Smart strategy, but far from Presidential
The younger 20-30 want a socialist government.
Re: Smart strategy, but far from Presidential
Quote:
Originally Posted by
catmanjack
The younger 20-30 want a socialist government.
Yep, b/c they are dumb as bricks and categorically lazy.
Re: Smart strategy, but far from Presidential
Had a 25 year old try to explain to me why a socialist government would be good.
This one is going to Yale.
Re: Smart strategy, but far from Presidential
My unpopular opinion is the 1890s political process was a lot better, tbh. No primaries, candidates picked at a true convention of delegates from all over the country, front-porch campaigns by the candidates with surrogates doing the talking and campaigning in individual cities and states. So much of what we do now is just fodder for the media beast to consume and fuel its 24-hour media cycle.
So i think it would be a lot better if both candidates shut up.