MickintheHam
08-13-2020, 10:32 PM
The link says it all.
https://www.al.com/news/2020/08/can-alabamas-coronavirus-numbers-be-trusted-maybe-sort-of-not-exactly.html
Anyone who has spent 30 seconds reading any of my posts on Covid 19 knows I have said data being used does not meet any standard whatsoever. The CDC has obviously not outlined to the individual states how to manage and report data. My guess is it's all suspect.
In Alabama, some labs were not reporting data to the State Health Dept. They didn't know they had to. The state didn't know the labs were testing. As the author points out his small home county has had daily spikes. It turns out the spikes were the result of the labs starting to report and catching up on the backlog. The likely result is that when data showed good results, it probably wasn't so good. When data showed dire results, well it probably wasn't so bad. To some extent this is likely happening a number of places. The data makes little sense.
Again, it is an indictment of the health departments and the CDC specifically, They were not ready for this pandemic nor any pandemic. The entire medical community should be embarrassed. People can argue they needed more funding. The truth of the matter is no amount of money makes up for ineptitude. The healthcare workers in hospitals have done outstanding work durning the crisis, but the medical people in charge of leading us through the crisis iare clownish at best. There is no defending their ineptitude and lack of preparedness. Accurate, consistent and reliable data is at the heart of any reporting system. Decisions affecting the citizenry are a stab in the dark.
https://www.al.com/news/2020/08/can-alabamas-coronavirus-numbers-be-trusted-maybe-sort-of-not-exactly.html
Anyone who has spent 30 seconds reading any of my posts on Covid 19 knows I have said data being used does not meet any standard whatsoever. The CDC has obviously not outlined to the individual states how to manage and report data. My guess is it's all suspect.
In Alabama, some labs were not reporting data to the State Health Dept. They didn't know they had to. The state didn't know the labs were testing. As the author points out his small home county has had daily spikes. It turns out the spikes were the result of the labs starting to report and catching up on the backlog. The likely result is that when data showed good results, it probably wasn't so good. When data showed dire results, well it probably wasn't so bad. To some extent this is likely happening a number of places. The data makes little sense.
Again, it is an indictment of the health departments and the CDC specifically, They were not ready for this pandemic nor any pandemic. The entire medical community should be embarrassed. People can argue they needed more funding. The truth of the matter is no amount of money makes up for ineptitude. The healthcare workers in hospitals have done outstanding work durning the crisis, but the medical people in charge of leading us through the crisis iare clownish at best. There is no defending their ineptitude and lack of preparedness. Accurate, consistent and reliable data is at the heart of any reporting system. Decisions affecting the citizenry are a stab in the dark.