CitizenBBN
10-05-2016, 08:48 AM
END THE CURRENT DEBATE FORMAT.
Are you dumb enough to think that "moderators" picked from the mainstream media are going to range from anything other than subtle to outright bias against free markets, individualism and limited government? People who are completely absorbed in the Washington beltway and can't see the real world? Really?
So are you that stupid or that gutless or is it just that none of you were ever in real debate and have no clue how one should work?
End the moderator as an originator of questions. in real debate the judge doesn't set the topics or ask the cross examination questions. Let each side have an initial position (x minutes), other side gets a timed rebuttal, that side gets final rebuttal. Then switch sides and let the other introduce topics. Each one gets say 10 in a debate.
The only job of the moderator is to keep them from interrupting and coming to blows.
BTW in a real debate NO ONE interrupts. If someone does in this format you issue a penalty, they lose one of their topics. Simple.
If you really want it to be interesting, intermingle the topics with cross examinations. Also easily doable with no moderator asking the questions.
Just end this stupid format. It's just a dual press conference with a liberal picking the questions. You won't come out of it doing well you bunch of dumbasses.
Are you dumb enough to think that "moderators" picked from the mainstream media are going to range from anything other than subtle to outright bias against free markets, individualism and limited government? People who are completely absorbed in the Washington beltway and can't see the real world? Really?
So are you that stupid or that gutless or is it just that none of you were ever in real debate and have no clue how one should work?
End the moderator as an originator of questions. in real debate the judge doesn't set the topics or ask the cross examination questions. Let each side have an initial position (x minutes), other side gets a timed rebuttal, that side gets final rebuttal. Then switch sides and let the other introduce topics. Each one gets say 10 in a debate.
The only job of the moderator is to keep them from interrupting and coming to blows.
BTW in a real debate NO ONE interrupts. If someone does in this format you issue a penalty, they lose one of their topics. Simple.
If you really want it to be interesting, intermingle the topics with cross examinations. Also easily doable with no moderator asking the questions.
Just end this stupid format. It's just a dual press conference with a liberal picking the questions. You won't come out of it doing well you bunch of dumbasses.