The most transparent administration in hstory?

[Doc]

Yeah, they are transparent because I see them for exactly what they are. Is it any wonder people don't trust the government?

Link-State Department: Fox reporter question deleted by request (http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/06/state-department-fox-emails-223799)

So if you don't like it, you just edit it out...

then when caught, you lie about it and call it a glitch

then when caught on that, you can't identify the individual who made the call



As I stated in the past, I don't have any issue with "secret negotiations" and I suspect most reasonable American's don't. I think its understandable why some things are done that way... but what you don't do is lie and deceive after the fact. I might be tolerant of it if it occurred once but this is a repetitive pattern, whether its Bengazi or the IRS or how the AHCA was presented, etc.... its standard operating procedure

[KeithKSR]

Would we expect anything else from this administration?

[CitizenBBN]

No one would be upset they "lied" and didn't reveal secret negotiations. Of course they didn't, you can't conduct foreign affairs without some things being kept secret.

But as you point out the offense isn't the secret negotiations but how they handled it once it became clear it was happening. First lie about it, then try to cover it up in some awkward way.

[dan_bgblue]

Pickering and Boeing's Influence (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06/23/ex-clinton-official-got-boeing-bucks-while-pushing-iran-nuke-pact-before-25b-jet-deal.html?intcmp=hpbt3)